Intended Audience: Teens
Genre: Supernatural
Notes for Parents: Contains violence that may not be suitable for sensitive readers.
The Inside Cover
Sixteen-year-old
Nathan lives in a cage: beaten, shackled, trained to kill. In a modern-day
England where two warring factions of witches live amongst humans, Nathan is an
abomination, the illegitimate son of the world’s most terrifying and violent
witch, Marcus. Nathan’s only hope for survival is to escape his captors, track
down Marcus, and receive the three gifts that will bring him into his own
magical powers – before it’s too late. But how can Nathan find his father when
his every action is monitored, when there is no one safe to trust, not even
family, not even the girl he loves?
What the cover doesn’t tell
you:
This
is the author’s first novel, and the first book in a trilogy.
What’s good?
This
is a classic story of good versus evil. The trick is to figure out who’s good
and who’s evil! This first part of the series is basically a coming-of-age
story about a boy, Nathan, who’s rejected by his community because he’s half “good”
witch and half “bad” witch. He has to put his trust in strangers if he’s going
to develop his magic. Nathan is a natural protagonist and very likeable. The
supporting characters are strong and interesting, especially Mercury, Gabriel,
Annalise, and Marcus. The setting is modern but still has an old feel to it.
The plot is simple and easy to follow. Best Part: Despite what people say, Nathan still gives his dad the benefit of the doubt.
What isn’t good?
I’m not sure if it was the pacing or the
plotting, but the second half of the novel was difficult to read. Things were
happening, but it also felt like time was standing still. I was bothered by the
terms white and black to describe good and bad witches. It’s an old habit that
seems highly outdated for a novel set in modern times. The overall mood of the
story is sad, peppered with unfairness, unkindness, suspicion, distrust,
threats, blackmail, and some outright hatred. It leaves little room for hope. Worst part: Having a few chapters told from second-person point-of-view was unnecessary.
Recommendation þþþoo
The
story was good, but not great. Characterization was strong, but the plot was weak.
Nothing felt new or unexpected, and it lacked a sense of hopefulness. I’m sure
good will overcome evil, but it’s not really clear who or what “good” is. Despite
the criticism and probably because the characters were so well done, I still
found the story entertaining.Green, Sally. Half Bad. New York: Viking, 2014. (Hardcover)
No comments:
Post a Comment