Pages: 258
Intended Audience: Tweens and up
Genre: Speculative fiction (Alternate history)
Notes for Parents: Contains some mature scenes
The Back Cover
It’s
the summer of 1962, and Scott and his friends spend their days playing baseball
and thinking about girls. But the threat of nuclear war looms over everything
they do, and they are haunted by the idea that they could all be dead tomorrow.
Even
though the possibility of war is all anyone talks about, Scott’s dad is the
only one in the neighborhood who actually prepares for the worst, building a
bomb shelter to protect his family and stocking it with enough supplies to keep
them alive for two critical weeks. The neighbors scoff, but then, in the middle
of the night in late October, the unthinkable happens. Suddenly ten people are
crammed into a shelter built for four. Ten people eating the food meant for
four, breathing the air meant for four. Ten people struggling to survive—but
what will await them when they eventually emerge?
What the cover doesn’t tell
you:
The
author has a very personal connection to this story in that his family was one
of those few who built a bomb shelter in the 1960s. Read the “Author’s Note” at
the back of the book!
What’s good?
It’s
a modern day Noah’s Ark story when Scott’s dad is ridiculed for building a bomb
shelter in the backyard. But no one is laughing when the sirens sound and the
bombs drop sending Scott and his family, and six other unexpected people
underground, trapping them together until the radiation dissipates. The plot is
simple but filled with tension and complications. The pace is quick with Scott’s
narrative flipping between his innocent childhood before the sirens sound, and
his horrifying new reality in the bomb shelter. This is less of an adventure
and more of a character study as Scott is more disturbed by the behavior of the
adults than the arrival of nuclear war. The story touches lightly, but
learnedly, on many subjects including the origins of the Cold War, the Cuban
Missile Crisis, racism, segregation, communism, the effects of nuclear
radiation, and the senselessness of mutually assured destruction. Difficult
decisions, disturbing moments, and complex problems make this a provocative and
compelling story.
Best Part: The exchange between the boys and their teacher when they’re kept in at
recess for bad behavior.
What isn’t good?
There are some mature scenes (like alcohol being
served to minors and Ronnie’s tawdry obsessions) that ring true but don’t
actually add to the story in any useful way. Scott’s friend’s nicknames are
annoying, especially Why Can’t You Be Like Johnny? Mr. McGovern is too
patronizing while Scott’s dad is too tolerant, though it’s hard to guess how
anyone would act in such a situation. The ending was appropriate, yet felt like
the beginning of something. Things were just starting to happen – and then it was
over.
Worst part: Scott’s essay about why people don’t want negroes to go to college
Recommendation ☻☻☻☻☻ (5/5)
The
Cold War reached its height in the 1960s when both sides (essentially the US
and Russia) were heavily armed with nuclear weapons. The fear of nuclear war
was so real, that schools had air raid drills, and some families built bomb
shelters. While the bombs never dropped, what if they had? Fallout tells an
unsettling tale of what might have happened if a nuclear war had been waged. This
story offers historical insight, moral quandaries, and is an excellent
character study for the middle grades. Highly recommended.
Strasser, Todd. Fallout. New York: Scholastic, 2013.
No comments:
Post a Comment